<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Phase to Ground &#187; AT&amp;T</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.phasetoground.com/tag/att/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.phasetoground.com</link>
	<description>Taking the path of least resistance since 2008</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 04 Jun 2010 18:17:23 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
		<item>
		<title>iPhone Users Upset With AT&amp;T</title>
		<link>http://www.phasetoground.com/tech/2009/06/iphone-users-upset-with-att/</link>
		<comments>http://www.phasetoground.com/tech/2009/06/iphone-users-upset-with-att/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Jun 2009 17:00:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>JeremyS</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Tech]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Apple]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AT&T]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iphone]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iPhone 3GS]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.phasetoground.com/?p=570</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[With Apples announcement of the iPhone 3GS, lots of AT&#38;T customers that had upgraded from the original iPhone to the iPhone 3G last July were anxiously awaiting the pricing to be announced from AT&#38;T. Now, before I get into what happened after that, lets go into a little history of the iPhone. The iPhone was [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>With <a href="http://www.apple.com" target="_blank">Apples</a> announcement of the <a href="http://www.iphone.com" target="_blank">iPhone 3GS</a>, lots of <a href="http://www.wireless.att.com/cell-phone-service/welcome/index.jsp" target="_blank">AT&amp;T</a> customers that had upgraded from the original <a href="http://www.phasetoground.com/tag/iphone/" class="st_tag internal_tag" rel="tag" title="Posts tagged with iphone">iPhone</a> to the <a href="http://www.phasetoground.com/tag/iphone/" class="st_tag internal_tag" rel="tag" title="Posts tagged with iphone">iPhone</a> 3G last July were anxiously awaiting the pricing to be announced from <a href="http://www.phasetoground.com/tag/att/" class="st_tag internal_tag" rel="tag" title="Posts tagged with AT&amp;T">AT&amp;T</a>.</p>
<p>Now, before I get into what happened after that, lets go into a little <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/History_of_the_iPhone" target="_blank">history of the iPhone</a>.</p>
<p><span id="more-570"></span>The <a href="http://www.phasetoground.com/tag/iphone/" class="st_tag internal_tag" rel="tag" title="Posts tagged with iphone">iPhone</a> was initially released in June 29, 2007 and was initially priced at $499/$599 for the 4GB and 8GB versions.  This also came with a forced data plan and 2 year contract with NO subsidy assistance from <a href="http://www.phasetoground.com/tag/att/" class="st_tag internal_tag" rel="tag" title="Posts tagged with AT&amp;T">AT&amp;T</a>.</p>
<p>On September 5th of the same year, <a href="http://www.phasetoground.com/tag/apple/" class="st_tag internal_tag" rel="tag" title="Posts tagged with Apple">Apple</a> dropped prices.  The 4GB version was discontinued and the 8GB was dropped to $199 ( with 2 year contract, the rest being subsidized by <a href="http://www.phasetoground.com/tag/att/" class="st_tag internal_tag" rel="tag" title="Posts tagged with AT&amp;T">AT&amp;T</a> ).  Those that had purchased the <a href="http://www.phasetoground.com/tag/iphone/" class="st_tag internal_tag" rel="tag" title="Posts tagged with iphone">iPhone</a> in the previous 2 weeks were protected by a price protection clause that <a href="http://www.phasetoground.com/tag/att/" class="st_tag internal_tag" rel="tag" title="Posts tagged with AT&amp;T">AT&amp;T</a> and <a href="http://www.phasetoground.com/tag/apple/" class="st_tag internal_tag" rel="tag" title="Posts tagged with Apple">Apple</a> both had and could be refunded the difference.  The other customers put up quite a fuss.  On September 6th Steve Jobs ( <a href="http://www.phasetoground.com/tag/apple/" class="st_tag internal_tag" rel="tag" title="Posts tagged with Apple">Apple</a> CEO ) announced that any <a href="http://www.phasetoground.com/tag/iphone/" class="st_tag internal_tag" rel="tag" title="Posts tagged with iphone">iPhone</a> customers that were not eligible for some other form of compensation, would be eligible for a $100 <a href="http://www.phasetoground.com/tag/apple/" class="st_tag internal_tag" rel="tag" title="Posts tagged with Apple">Apple</a> credit.</p>
<p>The <a href="http://www.phasetoground.com/tag/iphone/" class="st_tag internal_tag" rel="tag" title="Posts tagged with iphone">iPhone</a> 3G was released on July 11, 2008.  <a href="http://www.phasetoground.com/tag/att/" class="st_tag internal_tag" rel="tag" title="Posts tagged with AT&amp;T">AT&amp;T</a> continued thier subsidy plan.  With the release of the 3G, <a href="http://www.phasetoground.com/tag/att/" class="st_tag internal_tag" rel="tag" title="Posts tagged with AT&amp;T">AT&amp;T</a> decided to do something rather unique in the cellphone industry.  They allowed users that had purchased their original <a href="http://www.phasetoground.com/tag/iphone/" class="st_tag internal_tag" rel="tag" title="Posts tagged with iphone">iPhone</a> on or after May 27, 2008 to exchange it for an <a href="http://www.phasetoground.com/tag/iphone/" class="st_tag internal_tag" rel="tag" title="Posts tagged with iphone">iPhone</a> 3G.  Those that had purchased their <a href="http://www.phasetoground.com/tag/iphone/" class="st_tag internal_tag" rel="tag" title="Posts tagged with iphone">iPhone</a> BEFORE May 27th, were allowed to upgrade for the subsidized price and with a contract extension.  ( <a href="http://weblogs.redeyechicago.com/iphoneblog/2008/06/att-clarifies-n.html" target="_blank">source</a> )</p>
<p>This was a very rare move for a cellphone company.  Normally, until you are near or out of your contract period, if you want to want to upgrade your handset, you have to pay the unsubsidized price ( simiar to prices that the <a href="http://www.phasetoground.com/tag/iphone/" class="st_tag internal_tag" rel="tag" title="Posts tagged with iphone">iPhone</a> was when it was first released ).  <a href="http://www.phasetoground.com/tag/att/" class="st_tag internal_tag" rel="tag" title="Posts tagged with AT&amp;T">AT&amp;T</a> never said that this would be common practice and anyone that&#8217;s been paying for higher end phones for the last few years, should understand this was likely a very rare occurrence.</p>
<p>As mentioned <a href="http://www.phasetoground.com/tech/2009/06/apple-wwdc-2009/" target="_blank">last week</a>, <a href="http://www.phasetoground.com/tag/apple/" class="st_tag internal_tag" rel="tag" title="Posts tagged with Apple">Apple</a> announced the <a href="http://www.phasetoground.com/tag/iphone-3gs/" class="st_tag internal_tag" rel="tag" title="Posts tagged with iPhone 3GS">iPhone 3GS</a>. After it&#8217;s announcement, users excitedly went to the <a href="http://www.phasetoground.com/tag/att/" class="st_tag internal_tag" rel="tag" title="Posts tagged with AT&amp;T">AT&amp;T</a> and <a href="http://www.phasetoground.com/tag/apple/" class="st_tag internal_tag" rel="tag" title="Posts tagged with Apple">Apple</a> sites to see what it would cost them to upgrade their <a href="http://www.phasetoground.com/tag/iphone/" class="st_tag internal_tag" rel="tag" title="Posts tagged with iphone">iPhone</a> 3G from last year to the <a href="http://www.phasetoground.com/tag/iphone-3gs/" class="st_tag internal_tag" rel="tag" title="Posts tagged with iPhone 3GS">iPhone 3GS</a>.  To the shock of many users they were NOT eligible for the new user price.  If they wished to upgrade they would be asked to pay $399 for the 16GB version and $499 for the 32GB version. Those wishing not to add an additional 2 year to their contract would be asked to pay $599/$699 ( <a href="http://www.appleinsider.com/articles/09/06/08/iphone_3g_users_to_pay_200_premium_for_early_upgrade_to_iphone_3g_s.html" target="_blank">source</a> ).</p>
<p>Not surprisingly, <a href="http://www.phasetoground.com/tag/iphone/" class="st_tag internal_tag" rel="tag" title="Posts tagged with iphone">iPhone</a> users are upset, as many of them expected to be able to pay the $200 or $300 to upgrade like they did approximately 1 year ago. Since last weeks announcement <a href="http://discussions.apple.com/thread.jspa?threadID=2030615&amp;tstart=0" target="_blank">forums</a> have been <a href="http://forums.wireless.att.com/cng/board/message?board.id=apple&amp;thread.id=75133&amp;view=by_date_ascending&amp;page=1" target="_blank">flooded with disgruntled users</a> and <a href="http://www.informationweek.com/news/personal_tech/iphone/showArticle.jhtml?articleID=217800166" target="_blank">many</a> different <a href="http://www.computerworld.com/comments/node/9134218?page=3" target="_blank">sites</a> have written about the customer dissention.  There is even a twitten petition called <a href="http://twitition.com/f96aq" target="_blank">twitition</a> of uses &#8220;signing&#8221; asking <a href="http://www.phasetoground.com/tag/att/" class="st_tag internal_tag" rel="tag" title="Posts tagged with AT&amp;T">AT&amp;T</a> to offer the subsidized price to them. Some analysts are calling this a &#8220;crisis&#8221;, as was mentioned at <a href="http://www.computerworld.com/action/article.do?command=viewArticleBasic&amp;articleId=9134267&amp;intsrc=news_ts_head" target="_blank">ComputerWorld.com</a>.</p>
<p>Now, while I understand that a larger price tag, especially in this economy, is not something that anyone appreciates, but users have to realize that 1 year ago they signed a 2 year contract extention.  They also were able to the their <a href="http://www.phasetoground.com/tag/iphone/" class="st_tag internal_tag" rel="tag" title="Posts tagged with iphone">iPhone</a> price discounted because <a href="http://www.phasetoground.com/tag/att/" class="st_tag internal_tag" rel="tag" title="Posts tagged with AT&amp;T">AT&amp;T</a> was paying part of that pricetag to <a href="http://www.phasetoground.com/tag/apple/" class="st_tag internal_tag" rel="tag" title="Posts tagged with Apple">Apple</a>.  For <a href="http://www.phasetoground.com/tag/att/" class="st_tag internal_tag" rel="tag" title="Posts tagged with AT&amp;T">AT&amp;T</a> to make up the price, they assume the customer will fulfill their 2 year contract or pay an <a href="http://www.wireless.att.com/cell-phone-service/legal/plan-terms.jsp" target="_blank">early termination fee of $175</a> to get out of the contract.  While I sympathize with users wanting to upgrade to the lastest version, they really don&#8217;t have a leg to stand on.  They signed a two year contract and need to fulfill their end of the contract, since <a href="http://www.phasetoground.com/tag/att/" class="st_tag internal_tag" rel="tag" title="Posts tagged with AT&amp;T">AT&amp;T</a> fulfilled their end by providing a less expesnive phone.</p>
<p>Users that upgraded to the <a href="http://www.phasetoground.com/tag/iphone/" class="st_tag internal_tag" rel="tag" title="Posts tagged with iphone">iPhone</a> 3G should wait until next year.  Next year there will undoubtedly be yet another <a href="http://www.phasetoground.com/tag/iphone/" class="st_tag internal_tag" rel="tag" title="Posts tagged with iphone">iPhone</a> released ( possibly with an OLED screen? ) and your contracts will be over and you&#8217;ll be eligible for the new customer pricing.  I know our society now feels like they are entitled to everything they want when they want and how they want it, but at some point we have to grow up and comply with the responsibilities that signed up for.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.phasetoground.com/tech/2009/06/iphone-users-upset-with-att/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>iPhone (AT&amp;T), Pre (Sprint) or Andriod (T-Mobile)</title>
		<link>http://www.phasetoground.com/tech/2009/06/iphone-att-pre-sprint-or-andriod-t-mobile/</link>
		<comments>http://www.phasetoground.com/tech/2009/06/iphone-att-pre-sprint-or-andriod-t-mobile/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 07 Jun 2009 03:47:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>JeremyS</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Tech]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Apple]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AT&T]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iphone]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Palm Pre]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sprint]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[t-mobile]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.phasetoground.com/?p=415</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Come late July/early August I have a decision to make. My contract is up with T-Mobile, and while I&#8217;ve had pretty decent service with them ( overall ), there are times where I have been greatly troubled with T-Mobile&#8217;s coverage and there anemic G3 support. I currently have the T-Mobile Wing, and while it&#8217;s a [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Come late July/early August I have a decision to make.  My contract is up with <a href="http://www.phasetoground.com/tag/t-mobile/" class="st_tag internal_tag" rel="tag" title="Posts tagged with t-mobile">T-Mobile</a>, and while I&#8217;ve had pretty decent service with them ( overall ), there are times where I have been greatly troubled with <a href="http://www.phasetoground.com/tag/t-mobile/" class="st_tag internal_tag" rel="tag" title="Posts tagged with t-mobile">T-Mobile</a>&#8217;s coverage and there anemic G3 support.</p>
<p>I currently have the <a title="Wing" href="http://www.t-mobile.com/shop/Phones/Detail.aspx?device=acc8102d-4506-4eaa-bc2f-9c7b8ec1b1e0" target="_blank">T-Mobile Wing</a>, and while it&#8217;s a decent phone, it&#8217;s left me wanting more.  I need/want a phone that reacts faster.  I love the real keyboard that&#8217;s pretty amazing, I like the fairly large screen, but there are many things I wish it did&#8230;.better.</p>
<p><span id="more-415"></span></p>
<p>Here&#8217;s my current plan:</p>
<p>- 1500 anytime minutes<br />
- unlimited n/w<br />
- unlimited internet<br />
- unlimited MMS/SMS</p>
<p>Last month I used:<br />
- 1136 minutes used ( 127 off peak and 377 weekend ) 1554 total minutes just talking with Brooke.<br />
- 197 Text messages received<br />
- 156 Text messages sent</p>
<p>Apparently I am a fucking chatty Cathy on my cell phone, I had no idea I talked with Brooke that much.</p>
<h2>Plans</h2>
<p>This is where SOME of the concern is about what I&#8217;ll be paying per month, but none of them will DRASTICALLY change what I am currently shelling out to TMobile ($100/month ) for unlimited texting and internet w/1500 anytime minutes.  So, this is more of a perk if I can save some cash or get more bang for my buck.</p>
<h3>TMobile</h3>
<p>Tmobile has a $49.99/month unlimited calling plan which I quality for, and could pick up the <a href="http://www.phasetoground.com/tag/android/" class="st_tag internal_tag" rel="tag" title="Posts tagged with android">Android</a> at the same time.  I&#8217;d need to add texting and internet which would keep my bill at about $100 / month which is exactly what I pay now.  I&#8217;m not necessarily looking to SAVE money, but I&#8217;m looking to add utility while not spending MORE money.</p>
<h3>ATT</h3>
<p><a href="http://www.phasetoground.com/tag/att/" class="st_tag internal_tag" rel="tag" title="Posts tagged with AT&amp;T">AT&amp;T</a> for the <a href="http://www.phasetoground.com/tag/iphone/" class="st_tag internal_tag" rel="tag" title="Posts tagged with iphone">iPhone</a> offers the following plans ( all have unlimited web/email &amp; mobile to mobile )<br />
- $70 &#8211; 450 anytime/5000 Nights &amp; Weekends<br />
- $90 &#8211; 900 anytime/ unlimited Nights &amp; Weekends<br />
-$110 &#8211; 1350 anytime/ unlimited Nights &amp; Weekends<br />
- $130 &#8211; unlimited minutes</p>
<p>( rates taken from: <a href="http://www.wireless.att.com/cell-phone-service/specials/en/iReady_checklist.pdf" target="_blank">http://www.wireless.att.com/cell-phone-service/specials/en/iReady_checklist.pdf</a> )</p>
<p>None of these plans offer texting, and for unlimited texting I&#8217;d have to add an additional $20.  <a title="Cheaper iPhone plans soon a reality?" href="http://www.appleinsider.com/articles/09/05/18/repeat_att_may_introduced_20_limited_iphone_data_plan.html" target="_blank">There is rumor of some cheaper iPhone packages coming from AT&amp;T</a>, but that&#8217;s still a rumor.  I could drop to $90 + tax, probably taking me close to or exactly to what I pay now.</p>
<h3><a href="http://www.phasetoground.com/tag/sprint/" class="st_tag internal_tag" rel="tag" title="Posts tagged with Sprint">Sprint</a></h3>
<p><a href="http://www.phasetoground.com/tag/sprint/" class="st_tag internal_tag" rel="tag" title="Posts tagged with Sprint">Sprint</a> has the following offer:</p>
<p>- $99.99 &#8211; unlimited data/text/and calling</p>
<h2>Phones</h2>
<p>There has been a flood of information with the <a href="http://www.phasetoground.com/tag/palm-pre/" class="st_tag internal_tag" rel="tag" title="Posts tagged with Palm Pre">Palm Pre</a> being released this Saturday, June 6th.  There have been real handsets in possession of reviewers for a little less than a week now too.</p>
<h3>Andriod</h3>
<p>The TMobile G1 has been out a while and really banged on.  It&#8217;s a solid phone, but isn&#8217;t revolutionary by any means. The UI won&#8217;t wow anyone, the features don&#8217;t make any of the other smart phones sweat.  So, what&#8217;s so great about it?  2 words.  Open Source.  A platform with the kind of software support that <a href="http://www.phasetoground.com/tag/google/" class="st_tag internal_tag" rel="tag" title="Posts tagged with google">Google</a> can muster will eventually bring a lot to the table.  What are the downfalls of the current OS?  It&#8217;s not so much downfalls as in features it just doesn&#8217;t quite implement fully. <a href="http://www.phasetoground.com/tag/google/" class="st_tag internal_tag" rel="tag" title="Posts tagged with google">Google</a> set up the platform and is letting developers fill the gaps.  Well, if the userbase isn&#8217;t large enough, developers won&#8217;t flock to it like they did the <a href="http://www.phasetoground.com/tag/iphone/" class="st_tag internal_tag" rel="tag" title="Posts tagged with iphone">iPhone</a>.  It comes down to market share, and even app developers want to know they have an audience to develop for.</p>
<p>Once the Andriod phones start hitting other carriers, I&#8217;m sure we&#8217;ll see more apps and more people picking up the handset, for now I&#8217;ll leave it at the relatively small market share TMobile carries compared to the likes of Verizon and <a href="http://www.phasetoground.com/tag/att/" class="st_tag internal_tag" rel="tag" title="Posts tagged with AT&amp;T">AT&amp;T</a>. ( Verizon has 86.6 million U.S. subscribers<sup id="cite_ref-0" class="reference">, <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Verizon_Wireless#cite_note-0"></a></sup><a href="http://www.phasetoground.com/tag/att/" class="st_tag internal_tag" rel="tag" title="Posts tagged with AT&amp;T">AT&amp;T</a> has 78.2 million subscribers, and <a href="http://www.phasetoground.com/tag/t-mobile/" class="st_tag internal_tag" rel="tag" title="Posts tagged with t-mobile">T-Mobile</a> has 32.8 million subscribers ).</p>
<h3><a href="http://www.phasetoground.com/tag/iphone/" class="st_tag internal_tag" rel="tag" title="Posts tagged with iphone">iPhone</a></h3>
<p>The <a href="http://www.phasetoground.com/tag/iphone/" class="st_tag internal_tag" rel="tag" title="Posts tagged with iphone">iPhone</a> firmware 3.0 ( and possibly new hardware ) will be available sometime this summer (I&#8217;m thining June/July to combat the Pre hype ).  This is supposed to add much better support for Apples version of multi-tasking with the <a href="http://www.phasetoground.com/tag/iphone/" class="st_tag internal_tag" rel="tag" title="Posts tagged with iphone">iPhone</a>, copy &amp; paste ( about time ), sending photos &amp; sounds in MMS ( 3G phone only ), and texting/email in landscape layout ( also about time ).</p>
<h3>Pre</h3>
<p>Announced to be releasing on June 6th, many BestBuy stores are getting demo units in the coming days.  There&#8217;s one in Woodland Hills, CA that will have a demo unit, so I&#8217;ll try to have to check in there this weekend and see how I like the feel of it in my hand.  Some users have said it feels very &#8220;plastic&#8221;, and while the screen is crisp and clear, it feels like it&#8217;s not very &#8220;solid&#8221;.  The QWERTY keyboard got some bad comments in the lack of space between the top row of keys and the bottom of the slideup screen, posing problems hitting the correct keys at times.  I know a number of phones have a very similar slidup screen to expose a keyboard, I&#8217;m not sure if it&#8217;s just a comparison with what a user is used to, if they have really fat fingers, or if it is a legitimate problem.  A user at <a href="precentral.net" target="_blank">precentral.net</a> got a Pre a little early and has been leaving impressions there and answering questions.  Not sure if his is retail release or not though, if not this could be why some things aren&#8217;t working as documented.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.precentral.net/palm-pre-review" target="_blank">PreCentral.net</a> also has one of the most indepth ( if slightly biased ) towards the Pre.  Give it a read and watch the videos.  Apparently the gestures are not too intuitive ( not saying that any other device has that done pat either though ), and there is slowdowns and crashes.  Well, it&#8217;s software, that&#8217;s to be expected, especially with a first generation product.  There will be issues, and they will be addressed, but we don&#8217;t really know how long that is all going to take.  It may be until the phone hits multiple carriers ( rumored to be around the start of 2010 ) before we see v2 of WebOS.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.oliviamunn.org" target="_blank">Olivia Munn</a> wasn&#8217;t overly fond of the Pre with comments she left on twitter: Read them <a href="http://twitter.com/oliviamunn/status/2060684885" target="_blank">here</a> and <a href="http://twitter.com/oliviamunn/status/2060648523" target="_blank">here.</a></p>
<h3>Battery life:</h3>
<p>I&#8217;ve read reviews that run the gamut here, everything from my <a href="http://www.phasetoground.com/tag/iphone/" class="st_tag internal_tag" rel="tag" title="Posts tagged with iphone">iPhone</a> sucks and dies in 3 hours to my G1 sucks and dies in 3 hours to my G1 was amazing, it lasted ALL night and made me breakfast in the morning &lt;3.  It takes a little while of sorting through the fanboy noise to really find some consistent information.</p>
<p>All 3 phones are rated right around ~5hrs of talk time:</p>
<p>- <a href="http://www.t-mobile.com/shop/phones/Cell-Phone-Detail.aspx?cell-phone=T-Mobile-G1-with-Google-Black" target="_blank">G1 specs</a></p>
<p>- <a href="http://www.apple.com/iphone/specs.html" target="_blank">iPhone Specs</a></p>
<p>- <a href="http://images.intomobile.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/05/l-510-459-e7db4e20-546f-4d84-bcc1-fd4818024aff.jpeg" target="_blank">Pre Specs</a> ( this is unofficial, but the best I could find ).  Here are official specs: <a href="http://now.sprint.com/palmpre/" target="_blank">Palm Pre</a></p>
<p>I&#8217;ve found a copy of the <a href="http://www.phasetoground.com/tag/palm-pre/" class="st_tag internal_tag" rel="tag" title="Posts tagged with Palm Pre">Palm Pre</a> user guide(http://www.scribd.com/doc/15851822/SG-Pre-UserGuide) and it seems all the phones recommend the same thing for extending the battery life, turn off features, turn down the brightness and use it less.</p>
<p>With the exception of the turn down the brightness suggestion, the rest of the options kind of suck. You are buying a phone because of all the options it provides, not to have to turn them off to make the phone acceptable.  One thing that Pre and G1 have over the <a href="http://www.phasetoground.com/tag/iphone/" class="st_tag internal_tag" rel="tag" title="Posts tagged with iphone">iPhone</a> in this respect is the replaceable battery.  Replacing the battery on an <a href="http://www.phasetoground.com/tag/iphone/" class="st_tag internal_tag" rel="tag" title="Posts tagged with iphone">iPhone</a> voids the warranty and is akin to a small surgery.  Doing so with the Pre and G1 is like changing batteries in 99% of all cellphones: slide off the back, pop out the battery, put the new one in and replace the back plate.  Why <a href="http://www.phasetoground.com/tag/apple/" class="st_tag internal_tag" rel="tag" title="Posts tagged with Apple">Apple</a> went the way of the iPod and gave it a non-replaceable battery is beyond me.  No, people don&#8217;t like having to carry around a spare, but they do like having options.</p>
<p>The G1 has a few <a href="http://www.mugen-power-batteries.com/product_info.php?products_id=544" target="_blank">3rd party battery </a>that is rated at 2400 mAh, which lasts approximately 3 &#8211; 4 days of moderate use on 1 full charge.  Down side of this is that it nearly doubles the thickness of the phone, requires a new backplate ( supplied ) and costs around $60.</p>
<p>The <a href="http://www.phasetoground.com/tag/iphone/" class="st_tag internal_tag" rel="tag" title="Posts tagged with iphone">iPhone</a> also has battery extender options:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.phonesuit.com/products/MiLi_Power_Pack-14-10.html" target="_blank">http://www.phonesuit.com/products/MiLi_Power_Pack-14-10.html</a></p>
<p><a href="http://" target="_blank">http://fastmac.com/iv.php</a></p>
<p><a href="http://www.mophie.com/collections/batteries" target="_blank">http://www.mophie.com/collections/batteries</a></p>
<p>Personally, I think the <a href="http://www.phasetoground.com/tag/iphone/" class="st_tag internal_tag" rel="tag" title="Posts tagged with iphone">iPhone</a> 3rd party solutions are slicker and prettier than the G1 solution is ( Pre will probably fall into the same category ).  In the end it looks like this is a push.  All of them have &#8220;longer batteries&#8221; if at a $50-$100 cost, and will all give you that additional benefit.  The G1 gets a lot thicker, the <a href="http://www.phasetoground.com/tag/iphone/" class="st_tag internal_tag" rel="tag" title="Posts tagged with iphone">iPhone</a> gets a lot heavier.  Deal breakers for any of them?  No.</p>
<h3>Apps:</h3>
<p>Right now the <a href="http://www.phasetoground.com/tag/iphone/" class="st_tag internal_tag" rel="tag" title="Posts tagged with iphone">iPhone</a> has the nod on this one.  Why? Simple.  It&#8217;s the numbers.  Even if there are several thousand fart apps in the <a href="http://www.phasetoground.com/tag/iphone/" class="st_tag internal_tag" rel="tag" title="Posts tagged with iphone">iPhone</a> app store, there are an incredible number of apps that end up solving problems for people.  My co-worker was able to download an ssh client to remote into a server, restart some services and get things back up and running.  While I&#8217;m sure both the Pre and G1 will have expansive application bases at some point, they just aren&#8217;t to the same level as the <a href="http://www.phasetoground.com/tag/iphone/" class="st_tag internal_tag" rel="tag" title="Posts tagged with iphone">iPhone</a> at this point in time.</p>
<p>External Storage:</p>
<p>- Plain and simple the <a href="http://www.phasetoground.com/tag/iphone/" class="st_tag internal_tag" rel="tag" title="Posts tagged with iphone">iPhone</a> and Pre lack here.  The Pre is stuck at 8GB of storage ( about 7.4GB useable ) and the <a href="http://www.phasetoground.com/tag/iphone/" class="st_tag internal_tag" rel="tag" title="Posts tagged with iphone">iPhone</a> ranges between 8GB and 16GB depending on how much cash you shell out.</p>
<h3>What&#8217;s right for me:</h3>
<p>In the end what it all comes down to is to the carrier and then the phone.  <a href="http://www.phasetoground.com/tag/t-mobile/" class="st_tag internal_tag" rel="tag" title="Posts tagged with t-mobile">T-Mobile</a> has been solid for me, but with my spending more time in the Thousand Oaks area and unable to receive MMS while at work ( my phone lights up that I have a message but the content doesn&#8217;t download until I leave the office that evening ), <a href="http://www.phasetoground.com/tag/t-mobile/" class="st_tag internal_tag" rel="tag" title="Posts tagged with t-mobile">T-Mobile</a> just hasn&#8217;t grown like I need them to.  In fact, I think their coverage has actually degraded over the last few years when they decoupled the roaming onto many <a href="http://www.phasetoground.com/tag/att/" class="st_tag internal_tag" rel="tag" title="Posts tagged with AT&amp;T">AT&amp;T</a> towers ( locally ).</p>
<p>My younger brother has <a href="http://www.phasetoground.com/tag/sprint/" class="st_tag internal_tag" rel="tag" title="Posts tagged with Sprint">Sprint</a> and has been with them quite a while.  His coverage at home is sometimes spotty, but at work he has no problems with email, web, text or calling ( we do work in different areas ).</p>
<p>My younger sister ( who does not live with me ) has <a href="http://www.phasetoground.com/tag/att/" class="st_tag internal_tag" rel="tag" title="Posts tagged with AT&amp;T">AT&amp;T</a>, and whenever we&#8217;ve hung out she&#8217;s had coverage when I&#8217;ve played with her <a href="http://www.phasetoground.com/tag/iphone/" class="st_tag internal_tag" rel="tag" title="Posts tagged with iphone">iPhone</a> ( usually more &#8220;bars&#8221; than me, not that &#8220;bars&#8221; is an accurate measurement though ).</p>
<p>Right now I hate to say it, but the devil ( <a href="http://www.phasetoground.com/tag/apple/" class="st_tag internal_tag" rel="tag" title="Posts tagged with Apple">Apple</a> &amp; <a href="http://www.phasetoground.com/tag/att/" class="st_tag internal_tag" rel="tag" title="Posts tagged with AT&amp;T">AT&amp;T</a> ) are swaying me their way.</p>
<p>At this point I&#8217;m considering the $70 package with $20 for the text messaging.  All my mobile to mobile will be used with Brooke and if I get close to going over with general minutes I&#8217;ll just push up to the $90 package and be home free.  I&#8217;ll likely also add the Mili battery pack to add a few additional days of usage time, especially for those long hungover weekends when I&#8217;m not near the office or a charger.</p>
<p>The Pre looks very promising, but after checking out <a href="http://www.phasetoground.com/tag/sprint/" class="st_tag internal_tag" rel="tag" title="Posts tagged with Sprint">sprint</a> coverage in my areas of usual travel, <a href="http://www.phasetoground.com/tag/sprint/" class="st_tag internal_tag" rel="tag" title="Posts tagged with Sprint">Sprint</a> just doesn&#8217;t have the body of coverage that <a href="http://www.phasetoground.com/tag/att/" class="st_tag internal_tag" rel="tag" title="Posts tagged with AT&amp;T">AT&amp;T</a> and <a href="http://www.phasetoground.com/tag/t-mobile/" class="st_tag internal_tag" rel="tag" title="Posts tagged with t-mobile">T-mobile</a> do, and even TMo lacks compared to <a href="http://www.phasetoground.com/tag/att/" class="st_tag internal_tag" rel="tag" title="Posts tagged with AT&amp;T">AT&amp;T</a> out here.  Around the turn of 2010 several other carriers ( may ) get the <a href="http://www.phasetoground.com/tag/palm-pre/" class="st_tag internal_tag" rel="tag" title="Posts tagged with Palm Pre">Palm Pre</a> and at that time I can reconsider my phone options if I so desire.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.phasetoground.com/tech/2009/06/iphone-att-pre-sprint-or-andriod-t-mobile/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Google Phone still due this year</title>
		<link>http://www.phasetoground.com/tech/2008/08/google-phone-still-due-this-year/</link>
		<comments>http://www.phasetoground.com/tech/2008/08/google-phone-still-due-this-year/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Aug 2008 21:44:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>tor</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Tech]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[android]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AT&T]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iphone]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[t-mobile]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.phasetoground.com/?p=30</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[According to an article in the New York Times, an Android phone is still due to be launched this year. The phone will be made by HTC and first available to T-mobile subscribers. There&#8217;s video up on Youtube here that shows what it looks like. Now I know phone companies and service providers like to [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>According to an article in the <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2008/08/15/technology/15google.html?_r=2&amp;partner=rssnyt&amp;emc=rss&amp;oref=slogin&amp;oref=slogin" target="_blank">New York Times</a>, an <a href="http://www.phasetoground.com/tag/android/" class="st_tag internal_tag" rel="tag" title="Posts tagged with android">Android</a> phone is still due to be launched this year. The phone will be made by HTC and first available to <a href="http://www.phasetoground.com/tag/t-mobile/" class="st_tag internal_tag" rel="tag" title="Posts tagged with t-mobile">T-mobile</a> subscribers. There&#8217;s video up on Youtube <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WCyceYJRUtE&amp;eurl">here</a> that shows what it looks like.</p>
<p>Now I know phone companies and service providers like to set up partnerships to guarantee that someone will buy the phone, but making them exclusive to one company is just bad business. It doesn&#8217;t sound like <a href="http://www.phasetoground.com/tag/google/" class="st_tag internal_tag" rel="tag" title="Posts tagged with google">Google</a> will be doing that with the <a href="http://www.phasetoground.com/tag/android/" class="st_tag internal_tag" rel="tag" title="Posts tagged with android">Android</a>, or dream as they&#8217;re calling it, but I for one will never own an <a href="http://www.phasetoground.com/tag/iphone/" class="st_tag internal_tag" rel="tag" title="Posts tagged with iphone">iPhone</a> while <a href="http://www.phasetoground.com/tag/att/" class="st_tag internal_tag" rel="tag" title="Posts tagged with AT&amp;T">AT&amp;T</a> has exclusive rights to it, I just don&#8217;t like <a href="http://www.phasetoground.com/tag/att/" class="st_tag internal_tag" rel="tag" title="Posts tagged with AT&amp;T">AT&amp;T</a>. I know you&#8217;re saying, well, stupido, just buy one and crack it! Only problem with that is that I currently have (and like) <a href="http://www.phasetoground.com/tag/sprint/" class="st_tag internal_tag" rel="tag" title="Posts tagged with Sprint">Sprint</a> for my cell phone provider, but they use CDMA whereas the <a href="http://www.phasetoground.com/tag/iphone/" class="st_tag internal_tag" rel="tag" title="Posts tagged with iphone">iPhone</a> is still GSM-only. I&#8217;m sure <a href="http://www.phasetoground.com/tag/att/" class="st_tag internal_tag" rel="tag" title="Posts tagged with AT&amp;T">AT&amp;T</a> is loving the exclusive contract, but there doesn&#8217;t seem to be anything in that deal that sounds appealing to <a href="http://www.phasetoground.com/tag/apple/" class="st_tag internal_tag" rel="tag" title="Posts tagged with Apple">Apple</a>. They get less sales and have to deal with a subpar service provider.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.phasetoground.com/tech/2008/08/google-phone-still-due-this-year/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
